The phrase "was at odds" is an idiomatic expression that refers to a state of disagreeing or conflicting with someone or something. When two or more parties are at odds, they hold opposing opinions, ideas, interests, or goals, leading to divergence and disagreement. The phrase can be used to describe interpersonal conflicts between individuals, disagreements within a group or organization, or even contradictions between theories or concepts.
Being at odds can manifest as a lack of consensus, a contentious dispute, or a fundamental clash of viewpoints. It often implies a degree of opposition or tension, suggesting that the parties involved are not in harmony or agreement. This state of discord may arise due to differences in values, beliefs, priorities, strategies, or objectives.
The phrase "was at odds" can be applied to various contexts, such as personal relationships, professional settings, or even political and social spheres. It denotes a state of contention or disagreement that can hinder cooperation, collaboration, or progress. However, being at odds does not necessarily imply hostility or animosity; it merely suggests that conflicting perspectives or interests are present, requiring resolution, negotiation, or compromise to restore harmony or achieve a common goal.
